Calcutta High Court

WPA/25601/2026 of MOHAMMED MARUF UDDIN MALLIK Vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. no. 21 SL. 264 Samarpita In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25601/2026 MOHAMMED MARUF UDDIN MALLIK VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS Mr. Mijanul Kabir, Ms. Luna Khatoon, Ms. Riya Ghosh .. for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey, .. for

13.10.2026

Ct. no. 21

SL. 264

Samarpita

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/25601/2026

MOHAMMED MARUF UDDIN MALLIK

VS

THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

Mr. Mijanul Kabir,

Ms. Luna Khatoon,

Ms. Riya Ghosh

.. for the Petitioner

Ms. Anamika Pandey,

.. for ECI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not given the opportunity of hearing and his name has been deleted.

2. Heard the learned Advocate representing the Election Commission of India considering the fact that the petitioner has not been given the opportunity of hearing, the Tribunal is requested to hear out the matter with the further request to dispose of the same as the earliest preferably within three months after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel representing the Election Commission of India also admits the fact.

4. Heard the learned advocates considering of the petitioner, the Tribunal is requested to dispose of the matter at the earliest, preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the communication, considering the special circumstance.

5. The EPIC number of the petitioner is TGC2182491.

6. Accordingly, W.P.A. 25601 of 2026 is disposed of.

2

7. There shall be no order as to cost.

8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.

(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead