Calcutta High Court

WPA/28173/2026 of BIVASH CHANDRA SEAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 12 October 2026

AD/79/18 266312 NANDY (CO-DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/28173/2026 BIVASH CHANDRA SEAL VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Srinjay Sengupta, Advocate Mr. Saurav Roy, Advocate Mr. Ankush Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Prasenjit Jana, Advocate

AD/79/18

266312

NANDY

(CO-DO)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/28173/2026

BIVASH CHANDRA SEAL

VS

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

Mr. Srinjay Sengupta, Advocate

Mr. Saurav Roy, Advocate

Mr. Ankush Ghosh, Advocate

Mr. Prasenjit Jana, Advocate

Mr. Sagnik Sinha Roy, Advocate

……for the Petitioner

Mr. Koishik Bhatta, Advocate

Mr. Saumen Gayen, Advocate

……for the State

Mr. Niladri Bhattacharjee, Advocate

Ms. Deblina Chattaraj, Advocate

……for the WBTC

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today be kept with the records.

2. The petitioner retired on superannuation from the Calcutta Tramways Company (1978) Limited currently known as the West Bengal Transport Corporation Limited on 31.01.2025. Though other retiral dues were paid to the petitioner within time, but provident fund dues were released in favour of the petitioner on 06.08.2026.

3. The petitioner prays for interest on account of delay in releasing the provident fund dues.

4. It is settled law that the right of a retired employee to get his retiral dues on the date of attaining superannuation is a valuable right which accrues in his favour on the date of his attaining superannuation. Retiral dues are no more considered to be a bounty to be handed out by the State at its whim. An employee has a P a g e | 2

Page 1 of 2

statutory right to receive such payment upon retirement. If payment is delayed, the retired employee is surely entitled to get some interest for such delayed payment.

5. In the present case, it was the bounden duty of the employer to disburse the provident fund amount on the due date. As the employer has failed to do so and has released such amount after unexplained delay, the employer is obliged to pay interest to the retired employee.

6. In view of the above, I direct the concerned authority of the Corporation to pay to the petitioner simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum on provident fund dues calculated on and from the next date of retirement till the date of actual payment within a period of four months from the date of communication of this order.

7. In default of paying interest to the petitioner in terms of the aforesaid direction, the concerned respondent authority shall be liable to pay additional simple interest at the rate of 2% i.e. (6+2)= 8% on provident fund dues.

8. The writ-petition stands disposed of.

9. Urgent Photostat Certified Copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.)

P a g e | 3

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead