Calcutta High Court
WPA/24917/2026 of TARAJUL MALLIK AND ORS. Vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS on 12 October 2026
Item No.05 Court No.21 MKP WPA 24917 of 2026 TARAJUL MALLIK AND ORS. -Vs- THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS. Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta, Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty. ……for the Petitioners. Mrs. Anamika Pandey. ……….for the E.C.I. 1. The petitioners have the EPIC
15.10.2026
Item No.05
Court No.21
MKP
WPA 24917 of 2026
TARAJUL MALLIK AND ORS.
-Vs-
THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND
ORS.
Mr. Amaan Deep Gupta,
Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty.
……for the Petitioners.
Mrs. Anamika Pandey.
……….for the E.C.I.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioners have the EPIC Nos.MVQ2675122, THC2606093,MVQ2676823, THC1253400 and THC1746163.
2. The learned advocate representing the petitioners submits that deficit Court-fee has been paid and copy of the receipt has been filed, let it be kept with the record. Photocopy of the same is provided let it be kept with the record.
3. The learned advocate submits that in respect of the petitioner no.6, copy of the appeal has not been annexed with the writ petition. In such circumstance, seeks liberty.
4. Liberty is granted to the petitioner no.6 namely Samsiya Mallik to file afresh.
5. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition seeking appropriate order be passed so that conscionable justice may be done and now the Learned advocate representing the petitioners seeks direction as to the fact that the appeal preferred before the Tribunal be disposed of at the earliest.
6. Heard the learned advocate and on perusal of the record and considering the submission of the Learned advocate, it transpires that the petitioners have sought for early disposal of their grievance.
7. This Court has not gone into the merit of the case.
8. In view of the aforementioned discussion, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.
9. WPA 24917 of 2026 is disposed of.
10. Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis upon compliance of all formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)