Calcutta High Court

WPA/24923/2026 of SUKURUDDUIN SK Vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Ct. no. 21 SL. 60 (sg) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/24923/2026 SUKURUDDIN SK VS THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR. Mr. Pipasa Chakraborty, .. for the Petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey, .. for ECI 1. The learned advocate representing the

14.10.2026

Ct. no. 21

SL. 60

(sg)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

WPA/24923/2026

SUKURUDDIN SK

VS

THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR.

Mr. Pipasa Chakraborty,

.. for the Petitioner.

Ms. Anamika Pandey,

.. for ECI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The learned advocate representing the sole petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has already been enlisted. As such, the present writ application has become infructuous.

2. Considering the submission of the learned advocate that the name of the writ petitioner has already been enlisted, the writ petition is dismissed being infructuous.

(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead