Calcutta High Court
WPA/4906/2026 of SUSHIL PRAMANICK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 12 October 2026
12.10.2026 jb. WPA 4906 of 2026 (CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026) (Sushil Pramanick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.) Ziaul Haque Mr. Sudip Kushari …. For the Petitioner Ms. Smita Pal Mr. Abhee Dutta …. For the State Ms. Ipsita Ghosh Mr. Anish Sarkar Mr. Sandip Ghosh …. For
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
jdt. 12.10.2026 jb.
WPA 4906 of 2026 (CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026)
(Sushil Pramanick vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.)
Ziaul Haque Mr. Sudip Kushari …. For the Petitioner Ms. Smita Pal Mr. Abhee Dutta …. For the State Ms. Ipsita Ghosh Mr. Anish Sarkar Mr. Sandip Ghosh …. For the Respondent no. 4
Re: CAN 1 of 2026 and CAN 2 of 2026
The petitioner seeks restoration of the writ petition which was dismissed for default by an order passed on 23rd March, 2026 and condonation of delay in filing the restoration application. Heard learned counsels for the parties. Good grounds being made out, the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The restoration application is allowed for ends of justice. The order dated 23rd march, 2026 is recalled. The writ petition is restored to its original file and number. CAN 1 of 202 6and CAN 2 of 2026 are accordingly disposed of.
Re: WPA 4906 of 2026 The petitioner alleges that the private respondent is raising unauthorised construction without obtaining sanction from the concerned Panchayat. The petitioner submitted a representation in this regard before the concerned authority on 15th December, 2025 which is yet to be considered. The petitioner seeks consideration of the same. Learned counsel for the private respondent denies and disputes the allegation raised against him. In view of the fact that the representation is pending, the Pradhan, Begri Gram Panchayat, being the 2nd respondent herein, is directed to consider and dispose of the same within four weeks from the date of communication of this order upon granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to all concerned including the petitioner and the private respondent, in accordance with law. The decision taken by the authority shall be communicated to the parties within in a week thereof. In the event the construction raised by the private respondent is found to be illegal/unauthorised, the concerned authority shall take necessary steps in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit has been invited, allegations contained in the writ petition shall be deemed not to have been admitted.
Urgent certified website copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties on compliance of requisite formalities.
(Suvra Ghosh, J.)