Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2100/2026 of SAIDUL MONDAL @ SAIDUL MANDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L. 22. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2100 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Harirampur Police Station Case No. 163 of 2026 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
09.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 22. Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (NDPS) 2100 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Harirampur Police Station Case No. 163 of 2026 dated 12.05.2026 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Saidul Mondal @ Saidul Mandal
……Petitioner.
Mr. Kaushik Choudhury
Mr. Dwaipayan Panda
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Kaustav Shome Mr. Anirban Kumar Banerjee
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that although there has been alleged recovery of 159 bottles of Wincerex Cough Syrup but there has been no recovery from the present petitioner. Petitioner has been implicated on the basis of statement of co-accused.
Learned advocate for the State submits that the recovery was from other accused person. However, the said accused has named the present petitioner. On a specific query from this Court learned advocate for the State relying upon the Memo of Evidence submits that there are no antecedents or any Call Detail Records or money trail between the present petitioner and the principal accused from whom recovery has been effected.
2
Having taking into account the overall circumstances I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, petitioner, namely, Saidul Mondal @ Saidul Mandal be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge, NDPS Act, 3rd Court, Balurghat, Dakshin Dinajpur.
If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Dakshin Dinajpur without the prior permission of the learned Special Court. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2100 of 2026 is allowed.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)