Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2104/2026 of KABIR HOSSAIN SK @ VULAN SK. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
cm/sdas ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2104 of 2026 sl no.29 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliganj P.S. Case No. 511 of 2025 dated 13.06.2025 under Sections 117(2)/118(2)/109/103(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
09.10.2026
cm/sdas
ct 33
C.R.M. (M) 2104 of 2026
sl no.29
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Kaliganj P.S. Case No. 511
of 2025 dated 13.06.2025 under Sections 117(2)/118(2)/109/103(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Allowed
In Re : Kabir Hossain.
….. petitioner
Mr. Ali Ahsan Alamgir
Ms. Rabia Khatoon
Ms. Soma Mal
Ms. June Modak
Mr. Debarpan Bose
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Krishnendu Bhattacharya, learned APP
Ms. Priti Kar Bagchi
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted one of the co-accused persons has been granted anticipatory bail by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP(Crl.) No. 6409 of 2026 on 15th April, 2026. The co-ordinate Bench of this Court had granted bail to another co-accused person by the order dated 23rd July, 2026 and prayed for grant of bail on parity as claimed by them.
2. Learned Advocate representing the State submitted that the application for bail in CRM 883 of 2026 in context of the present petitioner had been dismissed on 25th June, 2026 by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The case has not been committed till date. Four accused persons are still absconding and release of the petitioner on bail will affect the trial immensely and opposed the prayer for bail.
2
3. Considering the narrative of the complaint, the statements recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS and the injury report and the fact that the co-accused persons, as stated above had been released on bail and the possibility of trial to commence being remote, prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Krishnagar, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and shall visit the local police station once in a week until further orders.
5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.
6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2104 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)