Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2107/2026 of BAPAN BISWAS @ BABUN @ KALA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2107 of 2026 sl no. 44 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah Police Station Case No. 79 of 2025 dated 03.02.2025 Sections 85/103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And
09.10.2026
ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2107 of 2026
sl no. 44
cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah Police Station Case No. 79 of 2025 dated 03.02.2025 Sections 85/103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
Rejected
In Re : Bapan BIswas @ Babun @ Kala.
….. petitioner
Mr. Wasim Akram
Ms. Sabrina Parvin
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Subhabrata Chowdhury
Mr. Soumalya Dutta
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate petitioner referred to an order dated 8th December, 2025 passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court in CRM(M) 1675 of 2025 wherein considering the gravity of the offence the concerned coordinate Bench rejected the prayer for bail directing the Trial Court take steps to examine the vulnerable witnesses within a period of 6 months from the next date so fixed.
2. However, the learned advocate representing the State submitted the order of the coordinate Bench dated 8th December, 2025 could not have been complied with.
3. The learned Trial Court is to positively comply with the order dated 8th December, 2025 as expeditiously as possible and a report by 23rd December, 2026 to be filed by the prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2107 of 2026 is dismissed.
2
5. After recording the evidence of the vulnerable witnesses the petitioner will be at liberty to seek renewal of the prayer for bail.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)