Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3396/2026 of SK TINKU ALI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
no. 11 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3396/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
09.10.2026
Serial no. 11
Anticipatory bail
[Rejected]
Dd
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional
Appellate Side
CRM (A)/3396/2026
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Arambagh Police Station Case No. 204 of 2026 dated 20.05.2026 under Sections 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1885
-And-
In the matter of : SK TINKU ALI
… …Petitioner
Md. Anwar Hossain,
Mr. Benajir Hasna,
M. A. Tslam, Advocates
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Rajendra Banerjee,
Mr. Goutam Dey,
Ms. Anita Panday, Advocates
… …For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Crude bombs were recovered on the leading statement made by the co-accused while in custody.
2. The co-accused implicates the petitioner herein.
3. Investigation is still in progress.
4. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the crude bombs were seized from an abandoned place. Petitioner stands falsely implicated due to political affiliation of the petitioner.
5. In view of the recovery of the crude bombs on the leading statement made by the co-accused and such co-accused naming the petitioner as the person involved, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
2
6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
7. CRM (A)/3396/2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) DEBABRATA DAS Digitally signed by DEBABRATA DAS Date: 2026.10.09 18:05:50 +05'30'