Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3437/2026 of AROBINDRA SARDAR AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.27 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3437 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with

09.10.2026

Item No.27

Court No.37

(Bench ID-265691)

CHC

Allowed

In The High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M.(A) 3437 of 2026

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Minakhan Police Station Case No. 311 of 2026 dated 25.06.2026 under Sections 329(4)/115(2)/117(2)/76/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2023, pending before the Court of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Basirhat, North 24 Parganas.

And

In the matter of : Arobindra Sardar & Anr.

...… petitioners

Mr. Abhijit Sarkar, Advocate

.…for the petitioners

Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya, Ld. Sr. Govt. Advocate Mr. Shankar Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Tirthankar Das, Advocate

.…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

2. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. Victim recorded her statement under Section 183 of BNSS.

4. Statement demonstrates that, there was pre-existing land disputes between the private parties.

5. Clear case of molestation is not made out by the victim.

6. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on condition that petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

9. CRM(A) 3437 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:36:45 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead