Calcutta High Court

CRM (NDPS)/2099/2026 of MOBARAK @ MD MOBARAK SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Court No.35. D/L. 21. Kausik (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2099 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 202 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

09.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L. 21. Kausik (Allowed)

CRM (NDPS) 2099 of 2026

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Kaliachak Police Station Case No. 202 of 2026 dated 09.02.2026 under Sectioins 21(c)/27(A)/29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

And In the matter of : Mobarak @ Md Mobarak Sk

……Petitioner.

Mr. Md. Wasim Akram

Ms. Sabrina Parveen

……for the Petitioner.

Mr. Somnath Adhikary Ms. Madhurai Sinha

……for the State.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the recovery in this case is 257 Gms. of Brown Sugar from other accused persons. There has been no recovery from the present petitioner and petitioner is in custody for 68 days. Charge sheet has already been submitted in connection with the instant case.

Learned advocate for the State submits that Memo of Evidence do not reflect the complicity of the present petitioner. Although he has been accused in the present case, his name being furnished in the charge sheet.

Having considered the submissions advanced, I am of the opinion further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.

2

As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. As such, petitioner, namely, Mobarak @ Md Mobarak Sk be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge, NDPS Act, 4th Court, Malda.

If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of Malda without the prior permission of the learned Special Court. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 2099 of 2026 is allowed.

All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead