Calcutta High Court
MAT/2227/2017 of SUSHANTA ADAK & ORS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS on 9 October 2026
09, 2026. KAUSHIK. MAT 2227 of 2017 CAN 1 of 2017 (Old CAN 12312 of 2017) CAN 2 of 2018 (Old CAN 4036 of 2018) CAN 3 of 2018 (Old CAN 4062 of 2018) CAN 4 of 2018 (Old CAN 4066 of 2018) CAN 5 of 2018 (Old CAN 4068 of 2018) CAN 6 of 2018 (Old CAN 4076 of 2018) Sushanta Adak & Ors. Vs. The State
D/L.90.
October 09, 2026.
KAUSHIK.
MAT 2227 of 2017
CAN 1 of 2017 (Old CAN 12312 of 2017)
CAN 2 of 2018 (Old CAN 4036 of 2018)
CAN 3 of 2018 (Old CAN 4062 of 2018)
CAN 4 of 2018 (Old CAN 4066 of 2018)
CAN 5 of 2018 (Old CAN 4068 of 2018)
CAN 6 of 2018 (Old CAN 4076 of 2018)
Sushanta Adak & Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call.
2. This matter had been appearing in the Warning List and the parties are deemed to have had sufficient notice that the matter would be taken up for hearing today. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable.
3. In fact, the matter had been adjourned on 6 October, 2026 when either of the parties remains unrepresented.
4. In view of the above, MAT 2227 of along with connected interlocutory applications stands dismissed for default.
5. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated.
6. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)
(Atarup Banerjee, J.)