Calcutta High Court
/3442/2026 of HARJINDAR SINGH AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
Item No.31 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3442 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with
09.10.2026
Item No.31
Court No.37
(Bench ID-265691)
CHC
Allowed
In The High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3442 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Hirapur Police Station Case No. 56 of 2026 dated 12.03.2026 under Sections 105/3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending before the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Asansol.
And
In the matter of : Harjindar Singh & Anr.
...… petitioners
Mr. Swapan Banerjee, Advocate
Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate
Mr. Kaustav Banerjee, Advocate
.…for the petitioners
Ms. Piyali Chatterjee, Advocate
Ms. Shalu Gupta, Advocate
Ms. Kritika Jain, Advocate
.…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record.
2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
4. Police filed charge-sheet.
5. Apparently, petitioner no.1 requires to undergo dialysis. Petitioner no.2 is a lady.
6. In such circumstances, considering the medical condition of the petitioner no.1 and considering the fact that, petitioner no.2 is a lady and considering the fact that, police filed charge-sheet, I do not deem it appropriate to
2 place the petitioners in custody. Consequently, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
9. CRM(A) 3442 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:45:09 +05'30'