Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/232/2026 of TAHAMINA KHATUN Vs DEBOJYOTI TALUKDER on 9 October 2026
09.10.2026 Court No. 550 Rohan In the High Court at Calcutta Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPCRC 232 of 2026 In WPA 1642 of 2025 Tahamina Khatun Versus Mr. Debojyoti Talukder Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy Mr. Ankan Das … for the Petitioner Mr. Ram Chandra Agarwal Mr. Aniruddha Singh
Item No.- 3
09.10.2026
Court No. 550
Rohan
In the High Court at Calcutta
Special Civil Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPCRC 232 of 2026
In
WPA 1642 of 2025
Tahamina Khatun
Versus
Mr. Debojyoti Talukder
Mr. Debabrata Saha Roy
Mr. Ankan Das
… for the Petitioner
Mr. Ram Chandra Agarwal
Mr. Aniruddha Singh
… for the Alleged Contemnor
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned counsel for the alleged contemnor submits a report. Let it be taken on record.
2. The learned counsel for the alleged contemnor has submitted that the order dated 28th January, 2025 passed in WPA 1642 of 2025 has been complied with in letter and spirit.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also submitted that the order has been complied with and he has no grievance at all.
4. Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties, I am of the view that there is no need in keeping the matter pending since the order dated 28th January, 2025, which is under contempt, has been complied with.
2
5. Accordingly, WPCRC 232 of 2026 stands disposed of.
6. Rule, if any, stands discharged.
7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.)