Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2009/2026 of SALIMUDDIN SK Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
cm/s das ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2009 of 2026 sl no.19 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with STF (HQ) P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 Sections 25(1)( a )/25(1B)( a )/25(6)/25(8)/26/35 of the Arms Act, 1959 and
09.10.2026
cm/s das
ct 33
C.R.M. (M) 2009 of 2026
sl no.19
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with STF (HQ) P.S. Case No. 04 of 2025 dated 27.06.2025 Sections 25(1)(a)/25(1B)(a)/25(6)/25(8)/26/35 of the Arms Act, 1959 and Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,
2023.
Allowed
In Re : Salimuddin Sk.
….. petitioner
Ms. Anasuya Sinha
Mr. Joy Chakraborty
Mr. Sandip Dinda
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Kallol Mondal, learned PP
Mr. Aditya Tiwari
Ms. Namrata Chatterjee
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. From the submission of the learned Advocate representing the petitioner, it appears that the present petitioner had advanced certain amount of money for purchasing of firearms and ammunitions through online transactions. He had been in custody for the past 241 days. Recovery of the firearms and the other incriminating materials from the accused person was not conducted as per the seizure list. It was further submitted since the charge- sheet had already been filed, the petitioner might be granted prayer for bail.
2. Learned Advocate representing the State, opposing the prayer for bail, submitted a four-wheeler carrying the firearms and ammunitions, was proceeding from Bihar wherein the brother of the present petitioner had been involved in the transmission for sale of the firearms to the present petitioner. There are CDRs on record which will endorse the same.
3. Since the investigation in the instant case has been concluded and no further requirement has been proposed for further investigation, the prayer for bail is considered and allowed.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court at Barasat, North 24 Parganas, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction without prior permission and shall meet the local police station once in a week until further orders.
5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.
6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2009 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)