Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2083/2026 of BISWAJIT RAJMOLLA Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
cm/sdas ct 33 C.R.M. (M) 2083 of 2026 sl no.30 In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj P.S. Case No. 605 of 2026 dated 19.05.2026 under Sections 64/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Allowed In
09.10.2026
cm/sdas
ct 33
C.R.M. (M) 2083 of 2026
sl no.30
In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Raghunathganj P.S. Case No. 605 of 2026 dated 19.05.2026 under Sections 64/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Allowed
In Re : Biswajit Rajmolla
….. petitioner
Mr. Sandip Chakraborty
Mr. Kaustav Das
Ms. Payel Das
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Lokesh Sharma
Mr. Rishav Kumar Thakur
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted the petitioner to have been in consensual relationship with the de facto complainant, being a married woman separated from her husband engaged in a relationship with the present petitioner and on an allegation of having been denied of marriage as promised to her on the ground of her being a married lady. The petitioner had been falsely implicated in the instant case.
2. Learned Advocate representing the State, though opposed the prayer for bail, intensifying the gravity of the alleged offence of being physically violated and further assaulted not only by the petitioner but by his acquaintances and family members though acceded to a consensual relationship between the parties.
2
3. The charge-sheet has been submitted on 11th July, 2026, the statements recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS and the facts and circumstances of the case where the mutuality apparently revealed to have been based on consensual act, prayer for bail of the petitioner is considered and allowed.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Jangipur, on condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and shall visit the local police station once in a week until further orders.
5. In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.
6. The application being CRM(M) No. 2083 of 2026 is allowed and disposed of.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)