Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3490/2026 of SAHIL TARAFDAR AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
Item No.76 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3490 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with
09.10.2026
Item No.76
Court No.37
(Bench ID-265691)
CHC
Allowed
In The High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3490 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Kolaghat Police Station Case No. 102 of 2026 dated 13.02.2026 under Sections 317(2)/317(4)/303(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, pending before the Court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur at Tamluk.
And
In the matter of : Sahil Tarafdar & Anr.
...… petitioners
Mr. Malay Bhattacharyya, Advocate
Mr. Subhrajyoti Ghosh, Advocate
.…for the petitioners
Mr. Somopriyo Chowdhury, Advocate
Mr. Deepak Khetwat, Advocate
.…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
2. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
3. Police filed charge-sheet.
4. Petitioners stand implicated in a case relating to illegal sand mining.
5. Apparently, there are no criminal antecedents as against the petitioners.
6. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
2
7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
8. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
9. CRM(A) 3490 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:38:55 +05'30'