Calcutta High Court
WPA/22716/2026 of BEGAM NASARAT SAHANI Vs THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS on 9 October 2026
Ct. No. 42 Sandip WPA 22716 of 2026 Begam Nasarat Sahani Vs. The Election Commission of India & Ors. Ms. Anusree Sarkar … for the petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey … for E.C.I. Mr. Sudipta Maiti, Ms. Manisha Paswan …for the State. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner
174
09.10.2026
Ct. No. 42
Sandip
WPA 22716 of 2026
Begam Nasarat Sahani
Vs.
The Election Commission of India & Ors.
Ms. Anusree Sarkar
… for the petitioner
Ms. Anamika Pandey
… for E.C.I.
Mr. Sudipta Maiti,
Ms. Manisha Paswan
…for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having RGN2495273 has preferred an appeal against deletion of his name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal.
2. The petitioner prays for expeditious disposal of the said appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the Election Commission of India submits that huge number of appeals pending before the learned Appellate Tribunal, are being disposed of on a day-to-day basis.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
5. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order.
6. WPA 22716 of 2026 is disposed of.
7. There shall be no order as to costs.
8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.
(UDAY KUMAR, J.)