Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3448/2026 of SADIKUL SK @ SHEIKH AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No.36 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3448 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with

09.10.2026

Item No.36

Court No.37

(Bench ID-265691)

CHC

Allowed

In The High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M.(A) 3448 of 2026

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Sagarpara Police Station Case No. 513 of 2026 dated 30.06.2026 under Sections 21(C)/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985, pending before the Learned Judge, Special Court, under NDPS Act cum Additional Sessions Judge, 5th Court at Berhampore, Murshidabad.

And

In the matter of : Sadikul Sk @ Sheikh & Anr.

...… petitioners

Mr. Arnab Chatterjee, Advocate

Mr. Avik Ghosh, Advocate

.…for the petitioners

Mr. Brajesh Jha, Ld. A.P.P

Mr. Biswajit Tiwari, Advocate

Mr. Uttam Basak, Advocate

.…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

2. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

3. Police at this stage are unable to establish any nexus between the petitioners and the arrested co-accused with the commercial quantity of narcotics or the seized commercial quantity of narcotics.

2

4. In such circumstance, I am of the view that, the petitioners are able to overcome the restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, 1985.

5. Consequently, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on condition that petitioners shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

7. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

8. CRM(A) 3448 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:49:04 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead