Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3436/2026 of MONIRUL ISLAM @ NEWTON AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 9 October 2026
Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Rejected In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3436 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Ketugram
09.10.2026
Item No.26
Court No.37
(Bench ID-265691)
CHC
Rejected
In The High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3436 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Ketugram Police Station Case No. 462 of 2026 dated 30.07.2026 under Sections 331(5)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 62/
64/75/76/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
And
In the matter of: Monirul Islam @ Newton & Anr.
...… petitioners
Mr. Kallol Kumar Basu, Advocate
Md. Jannat Ul Firdous, Advocate
Mr. Rajsekhar Hota, Advocate
.…for the petitioners
Mr. Brajesh Jha, Ld. A.P.P.
Mr. K. Shome, Advocate
Ms. Priyanka Chandra, Advocate
…for the State
Mr. Anirban Sarkar, Advocate
…for the de facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. De facto complainant recorded her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS implicating the petitioners before Court in molesting her.
2. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the petitioners were falsely implicated.
3. There is a police complaint pending as against the husband and brother-in-law of the victim.
4. Police made seizure in the present police case. Seizure is of torn wearing apparels of the victim. Version of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS stands corroborated by the seizure made. There is one post
2 occurrence eye-witness who corroborates the version of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS.
5. Considering the gravity of the offence and involvement of the petitioners therein, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.
7. CRM(A) 3436 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:37:42 +05'30'