Calcutta High Court
WPA/26886/2026 of BADAL MONDAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. on 9 October 2026
Ct. No. 05 adeb WPA 26886 of 2026 Badal Mondal Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Biswajit Manna Ms. Moumita Biswas …for the petitioner Mr. Apurba Krishna Das Mr. Kallol Mumar Maity Mr. S.B. Mukherjee …for the respondent nos. 7 & 8 Ms. Indrani Chakraborty
09.10.2026
Ct. No. 05
adeb
WPA 26886 of 2026
Badal Mondal
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Biswajit Manna
Ms. Moumita Biswas
…for the petitioner
Mr. Apurba Krishna Das
Mr. Kallol Mumar Maity
Mr. S.B. Mukherjee
…for the respondent nos. 7 & 8
Ms. Indrani Chakraborty
Mr. Ganga Prasad Mukherjee
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record.
2. By presenting this writ petition prayer is made thereby directing concerned police authorities to take steps which would facilitate the petitioner to have peaceful possession over agricultural land in question. It is submitted by learned advocate representing petitioner that private respondents are causing disturbance in peaceful possession of land in question and to cultivate the said land.
3. State respondents and respondent nos. 7 and 8 are represented by learned advocates.
4. On perusal of complaint dated 4th August, 2026 addressed to concerned police authority it appears that complainant being petitioner admitted proceeding is pending in connection with land in question before the concerned Block Land and Land Reforms Officer for correction of record of rights and in this regard an application was made. If Court directs on allowing this writ petition police authorities to take steps for protecting right of petitioner in the land in question proceeding pending before concerned BL&LRO seeking correction of record of rights will be frustrated.
5. Hence, present writ petition is not interfered with and same stands dismissed.
6. However, this order shall not preclude the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/authority in accordance with law, if so advised.
7. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)