Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2111/2026 of SUKUMAR GHOSH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
15.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2111 of 2026 Sukumar Ghosh Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of
1
D/L 26
15.10.2026
Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)
ct.no.33
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
C.R.M (M) 2111 of 2026
Sukumar Ghosh
Vs
The State of West Bengal
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Itahar Police Station Case No. 650 of 2021 dated 18.10.2021 under Sections 302/34 of the IPC and read with Sections 25(II)(A)/27/35 of the Arms Act.
And
In the matter of : Sukumar Ghosh
…Petitioner.
Ms. Minoti Gomes
Mr. Jisan Iqbal Hossain
…for the Petitioner
Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya
Mr. Deepak Khetawat
…for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Inadvertently typographical error crept in order dated 09.10.2026. In 6th line of 2nd paragraph of the order dated 09th October, 2026 it was erroneously recorded as “41 out of 42 witnesses”, shall be read as “37 out of 42 witnesses”.
2. Department is directed to make necessary correction to that effect in the order dated 09.10.2026. Other portion of the order shall remain the same.
3. Copy of the order be sent to the Department for immediate compliance.
4. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)