Calcutta High Court
WPA/25435/2026 of RAFAT REYAZ Vs THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER AND ORS on 9 October 2026
Ct. no. 21 SL.87 (SG) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/25435/2026 RAFAT REYAZ VS THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, THE ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA AND ORS Mr. Shreyasi Nath, .. for the Petitioner Ms. Anamika Pandey, Ms. Gareema Parth .. for
09.10.2026
Ct. no. 21
SL.87
(SG)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
WPA/25435/2026
RAFAT REYAZ
VS
THE CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER, THE ELECTION
COMMISSIONER OF INDIA AND ORS
Mr. Shreyasi Nath,
.. for the Petitioner
Ms. Anamika Pandey,
Ms. Gareema Parth
.. for ECI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition seeking direction upon the SIR Tribunal to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner.
2. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner having EPIC No. ATR2154557 preferred an appeal against deletion of her name in the SIR process before the designated Appellate Tribunal.
3. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that she is seeking early disposal of the proceeding pending before the Tribunal.
4. Considered the submission of the learned advocate in view of the above the Appellate Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the appeal preferred by the petitioner as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order to the Tribunal.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the case.
6. Accordingly, WPA 25435 of 2026 is disposed of.
7. There shall be no order as to cost.
2
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of requisite formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)