Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2108/2026 of BISWAJIT RABIDAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026
ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2108 of 2026 sl no. 45 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No. 203 of 2025 dated 10.03.2025 Sections 109/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
09.10.2026
ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2108 of 2026
sl no. 45
cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station Case No.
of dated
10.03.2025
Sections
109/117(2)/118(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
Rejected
In Re : Biswajit Rabidas.
….. petitioner
Mr. Milon Mukherjee, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Soukteya Ganguly
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Palash Chandra Podder
Ms. Anindita Mukherjee
…… for the State
Mr. Debapriya Samanta
…. for the De-facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate petitioner submitted the charges to have been framed till date.
2. The learned advocate representing de-facto complainant is present and opposed the prayer for bail.
3. The learned advocate representing the State opposed the prayer for bail on the ground of severity alleged offences.
4. Considering the submissions of the learned advocates representing the respective parties as well as the materials on record, gruesomeness of the alleged offences, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. The Trial Court is to frame the charges within 21st December, 2026 and a compliance report be filed to that effect on behalf of the prosecution.
6. The learned advocate representing the State is to instruct the concerned learned advocate representing the prosecution appearing before the concerned Trial Court to assist the Court in framing the charges.
7. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2116 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)