Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3381/2026 of MEHER SK AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

DL-8 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3381 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with

09.10.2026

DL-8

Court No.37

[Bench ID-265691]

(AD)

(Allowed)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M. (A) 3381 of 2026

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Nakashipara Police Station Case No.558 of

dated

17.06.2026

under

Sections

318(4)/336(2)/336(3)/338/340(2)/3(5)

of

the

Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending before the Learned Sessions Judge, District-Nadia. S.L. No.2930 of 2026.

And

In the matter of: Meher Sk. & Ors.

….petitioners

Ms. Minoti Gomes, Advocate

Mr. Prabir Mazumdar, Advocate

Mr. Shehangshu Mazumder, Advocate

Ms. Anindita Kundu, Advocate

…for the petitioners

Mr. Indradip Das, Advocate

Ms. Rima Banerjee, Advocate

… for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record.

2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

3. Prayer for anticipatory bail is made on the ground of parity with the co-accuseds who were enlarged on anticipatory bail by the order dated October 7, 2026 passed in CRM (A) 3152 of 2026.

4. Materials in the case diary do not demonstrate that the petitioners stand apart from the persons who are afforded such facility so as to deny the claim for parity to the petitioners.

5. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

7. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

8. C.R.M. (A) 3381 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.09 18:46:02 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead