Calcutta High Court
WPCRC/67/2026 of NARAYAN CHANDRA HALDER Vs GANGA DAS PRADHAN BOLSIDDHI KALINAGAR GRAM PANCHAYAT on 9 October 2026
Sl. No.14 Ct. No.14 gd IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.C.R.C. 67 of 2026 Narayan Chandra Halder Versus Ganga Das, The Pradhan, Bolsiddhi-Kalinagar Gram Panchayat, District South 24-Parganas In WPA 15401 of 2024 Mr. Pradip Kumar Mondal Mr. Arka Mondal
09.10.2026
Sl. No.14
Ct. No.14
gd
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SPECIAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
W.P.C.R.C. 67 of 2026
Narayan Chandra Halder
Versus
Ganga Das,
The Pradhan,
Bolsiddhi-Kalinagar Gram Panchayat,
District South 24-Parganas
In
WPA 15401 of 2024
Mr. Pradip Kumar Mondal
Mr. Arka Mondal
… for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. Shyama Prasad Purkait
… for the alleged contemnor.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit of compliance filed on behalf of the alleged contemnor is taken on record. Copy served.
2. Mr. Shyama Prasad Purkait, learned advocate representing the alleged contemnor submits that the order of this Court has been duly complied with. Upon finding illegality in the work of construction in question, the matter has already been referred to the concerned Sub-Divisional Officer for taking steps in terms of Section 23(5) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. He also indicates that the concerned Sub- Divisional Officer has also issued notice on 1st July, 2026 for hearing.
3. Learned advocate for the applicant-petitioner concedes to such submissions.
4. In view of the above compliance, the contempt application being WPCRC 67 of 2026 stands disposed of.
5. Rule is discharged.
6. The personal appearance of the alleged contemnor is dispensed with.
(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) 2