Calcutta High Court

/3496/2026 of KAHINUR BEGUM @ KOHINOOR BEGUM AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 9 October 2026

Item No.82 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3496 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with

09.10.2026

Item No.82

Court No.37

(Bench ID-265691)

CHC

Allowed

In The High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M.(A) 3496 of 2026

In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Jagatballavpur Police Station Case No. 173 of 2026 dated 23.05.2026 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the Learned Sessions Judge, Howrah.

And

In the matter of : Kahinur Begum @ Kohinoor Begum & Anr.

...… petitioners

Mr. Simanta Kabir, Advocate

Mr. Avik Pramanick, Advocate

.…for the petitioners

Mr. Somnath Adhikary, Advocate

Ms. Madhurai Sinha, Advocate

.…for the State

Page 1 of 2

1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record.

2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

4. Police filed charge-sheet.

5. Both the petitioners before the Court are ladies.

6. Court is informed that, petitioner no.2 is 8 months’ pregnant.

7. Considering such factors, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

2

8. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

9. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.

10. CRM(A) 3496 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.09 18:31:25 +05'30'

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead