Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2070/2026 of BISWAJIT DAS @ PUCHI Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2070 of 2026 sl no. 36 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Halisahar Police Station Case No. 555 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025 Sections 103(1)/238( a )/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
08.10.2026
ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2070 of 2026
sl no. 36
cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Halisahar Police Station Case No.
of dated
26.12.2025
Sections
103(1)/238(a)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
Rejected
In Re : Biswajit Das @ Puchi
….. petitioner
Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay
Ms. Rajashree Tah
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Rajashree Venket Kundalia
Mr. Uttsav Dutta
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned advocate representing the petitioner submitted the petitioner to be in custody for 10 months. It was further submitted upon an application under RTI, the Dum Dum Central Correctional Home had informed the petitioner to be suffering from “periphery neurology” being treated by the medical officers and doctors of R. G .Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata. He seeks the petitioner to be enlarged on bail for further medical treatment.
2. The learned advocate representing the State referred to the statements of the inmates of the Rehabilitation Centre under the ownership of the present petitioner whereby the victim used to be regularly and frequently assaulted. The statements recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as 180 BNSS raised abominable instances to have been encountered by the victim. More so, endorsed by the injuries depicted in the post mortem report.
3. Considering the gravity and the intensity of the alleged offence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
4. The Dum Dum Correctional Home, authorities are to provide necessary medical facilities to the petitioner to the best of their convenience and ability.
5. Trial court is to frame the charges and proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.
6. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.
7. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2070 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)