Calcutta High Court

CRM (NDPS)/2049/2026 of ASRAFUL ISLAM @ SUMON ISLAM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

no. 10 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2049 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur PS Case No. 611 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28/29

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

08.10.2026 Serial no. 10 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)

CRM (NDPS) 2049 of 2026

In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur PS Case No. 611 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 u/s 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28/29 of the NDPS Act.

-And-

In the matter of : Asraful Islam @ Sumon Islam

… Petitioner(s)

Mr. Kaushik Choudhury

… for the Petitioner(s)

Mr. Pradeep Banerjee, APP Mr. Bibaswan Mukherjee

… for the State-respondent(s)

Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted in the instant case and there has been no recovery from the present petitioner. It has been further submitted that charge-sheet has already been submitted, as such, further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. State opposes the prayer for bail. It has been pointed out that further investigation has commenced and incriminating materials have been collected from the present petitioner. Learned advocate emphasizes that there are two criminal antecedents of the present petitioner: one of which happens to be a case under the NDPS Act.

Having considered the overall circumstances, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS)

of is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead