Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3393/2026 of MALAY BOSE Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 71 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3393/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
08.10.2026
Serial no. 71
Anticipatory bail
[Rejected]
Dd
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional
Appellate Side
CRM (A)/3393/2026
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Karaya Police Station Case No. 268 of 2026 dated 13.08.2026 under Sections 465/468/471/420/406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
-And-
In the matter of : MALAY BOSE
… …Petitioner
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, ld. Sr. Adv.
Ms. Priyanka Sarkar, Advocate
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Sourav Chatterjee, ld. Sr. Adv.
Mr. Dipanjan Dutt,
Mr. Soumyadeb Sinha,
Mr. Hiranyak Gangopadhyay,
Mrs. Suranjana Chatterjee, Advocates
… …For the de facto complainant
Mr. Subhendu Sinha Roy,
Mr. P. Karan Singh , Advocate
… …For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner in paragraph 23 of the application claims that there is no criminal case pending as against him.
2. In course of submission, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there is one criminal case presently pending as against the petitioner apart from the present one.
3. In view of such false statement being made in the application for grant of anticipatory bail, I am not minded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. CRM (A)/3393/2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) +05'30'