Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3363/2026 of SANBARTO PAL @ SAMBARTYA PAL Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
Item No.44 Court No.37 (Bench ID-265691) CHC Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M.( A ) 3363 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Suri
08.10.2026
Item No.44
Court No.37
(Bench ID-265691)
CHC
Allowed
In The High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M.(A) 3363 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Suri Police Station Case No. 491 of 2026 dated 27.07.2026
under
Sections
106(1)/318(4)/238/61(2)
of
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 2023 and adding Section 105 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, pending before the Court of Learned Additional District &
Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Suri, Birbhum.
And
In the matter of : Dr. Sanbarto Pal @ Dr. Sambartya Pal
...… petitioner
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Ld. Senior Advocate Ms. Priyanka Sarkar, Advocate Mr. D. Azad, Advocate
.…for the petitioner
Ms. Rajashree Venket Kundalia, Advocate
Mr. Narattam Acharyya, Advocate
.…for the State
Mr. Surajit Basu, Advocate
Mr. Abdur Rakib, Advocate
Mr. Tirtha Pati Acharya, Advocate
….for the de facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Memo of Evidence filed in Court be kept with the record.
2. A doctor is before Court seeking anticipatory bail.
3. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
4. Doctor stands accused of criminal negligence with regard to an unfortunate death of a patient.
5. A 16 years old victim expired in the hospital during treatment.
6. Petitioner was engaged as a Medical Officer.
7. There are issues as to whether, the petitioner could be engaged as Medical Officer or not.
8. Those issues may be decided at the trial.
9. Active role of the petitioner does not transpire from the case diary with regard to the unfortunate death of the victim.
10. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
11. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on condition that petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a month till the conclusion of investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner
in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
12. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
13. CRM(A) 3363 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Digitally signed by CHINMOY CHAKRABORTY Date: 2026.10.08 18:27:48 +05'30'