Calcutta High Court
CRR/1668/2024 of SANNYASHI DURLAV Vs KALIPADA DURLAV on 8 October 2026
Ct No. 42 SB CRR 1668 of 2024 Sannyashi Durlav Vs. Kalipada Durlav Ms. Karabi Roy Mr. Archishman Singh … for the petitioner Mr. P. Karan Singh … for the State 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner files photocopy of the orders passed in the impugned criminal
08.10.2026
SL No.15
Ct No. 42
SB
CRR 1668 of 2024
Sannyashi Durlav
Vs.
Kalipada Durlav
Ms. Karabi Roy
Mr. Archishman Singh
… for the petitioner
Mr. P. Karan Singh
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner files photocopy of the orders passed in the impugned criminal proceeding being Misc. Criminal Case No. 742 of 2021 and referring to the order dated 05.05.2025 passed by 6th Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Krishnanagar, Nadia, submits that the complainant, the opposite party herein, has filed a petition before the learned Trial Court for withdrawal of the said case, which has been allowed. Let the said document be taken on record.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in view of the said order dated 05.05.2025, the instant criminal revision has become infructuous and prays that the matter may be dismissed as such.
3. I have perused the order dated 05.05.2025 passed by the 6th Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Krishnanagar, Nadia passed in Misc. Criminal Case No. 742 of 2021, wherefrom it appears that the learned Trial Judge has allowed the petition of withdrawal of complaint filed by the opposite party.
4. In view of withdrawal of the said criminal proceeding, the substratum of challenge involved in the present criminal revision cannot be sustained, as such I am inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, C.R.R. 1668 of 2024 is dismissed as infructuous.
6. Pending connected application(s), if any, is also disposed of accordingly.
7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
8. There shall be no order as to costs.
9. Urgent photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Uday Kumar, J.)