Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2061/2026 of AMJAD SARKAR @ BAPI @ AMJAD BAPI SARKAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L.15. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 2061 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur Police Station case no. 611 of 2025 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L.15. Rakib (Rejected)
CRM (NDPS) 2061 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gangarampur Police Station case no. 611 of 2025 dated 12.09.2025 under Sections 21(c)/22(c)/23(c)/27A/28/29 of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Amjad Sarkar @ Bapi @ Amjad Bapi Sarkar
……Petitioner. Mr. Biswajit Manna
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Pinaki Bhattacharyya Mr. Suman Agarwal Mr. Amratya Mohan Bhattacharyya
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he disputes regarding the antecedents expressed by the State in connection with the Gangarampur Police Station case no. 781 of 2025 dated 11.12.2025 which is the other case pending as claimed by the State. It has been submitted that names which are appearing in the other case is not same and identical and is not of the same person. Prima facie, I do not find any materials to dispute the claim of the State which is in the form of a report signed by Sub-Inspector of Police, Gangarampur police station. Petitioner claims parity, however, when a criminal antecedent is present the principal of parity will not apply in view of the Section 37 of the NDPS Act. At this stage, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 2061 of 2026 is rejected.
2 Petitioner would renew his prayer for bail, if required, with fresh particulars. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)