Calcutta High Court
/3329/2026 of SNEHA DAS Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 30 Anticipatory bail [Rejected] Dd In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3329/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
08.10.2026
Serial no. 30
Anticipatory bail
[Rejected]
Dd
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional
Appellate Side
CRM (A)/3329/2026
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Liluah Police Station Case No. 215 of 2026 dated 06.05.2026 under Sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 118(2)/
109/351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of : SNEHA DAS
… …Petitioner
Ms. Meghna Chowdhury,Advocate
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Brajesh Jha, ld. APP
Mr. Sreshtha Ghosh,
Mr. Sanjana Jha, Advocate
… …For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Co-accused was denied anticipatory bail by the co-ordinate Bench.
2. Materials in the case diary suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the incident of assault.
3. Considering the gravity of the offence, involvement of the petitioner therein, I am not minded to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
5. CRM (A)/3329/2026 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) +05'30'
2