Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2075/2026 of LATIFUR RAHAMAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
Court No.35. D/L.20. Rakib (Allowed) CRM (NDPS) 2075 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chanchal Police Station case no. 159 of 2026 dated
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Court No.35. D/L.20. Rakib (Allowed)
CRM (NDPS) 2075 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chanchal Police Station case no. 159 of 2026 dated 22.02.2026 under Sections 21(c)/22(c) of the NDPS Act.
And In the matter of : Latifur Rahaman
……Petitioner. Ms. Jenifar Alam Megha
......for the Petitioner. Mr. Sayak Chakraborty Ms. Supriti Sarkhel Mr. Supriya Mahajan
……for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is similarly placed as Dulal @ Anil who has been granted bail in CRM (NDPS) 1229 of 2026. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer bail but is unable to distinguish the situational parity. Accordingly, petitioner be released on bail by the learned Special Court on same terms and conditions which were imposed upon Dulal @ Anil who has been granted bail in CRM (NDPS) 1229 of 2026. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the present petitioner namely, Latifur Rahaman is allowed. Thus, CRM (NDPS) No. 2075 of 2026 is allowed. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case.
2 Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)