Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2550/2026 of PANDIT ROY @ ACHINTA ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 8 October 2026
no. 5 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (M) 2550 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Mothabari PS Case No. 420 of 2026 dated 06.06.2026 u/s 329(4) of the BNS and section 4
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Serial no. 5 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (M) 2550 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Mothabari PS Case No. 420 of 2026 dated 06.06.2026 u/s 329(4) of the BNS and section 4 of the POCSO Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Pandit Roy @ Achinta Roy
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. S. Bera Mr. Abhishek Bhanja
… for the State-respondent(s)
Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in cusody for more than four months; charge- sheet has been submitted and there is no possibility of the trial being concluded very soon, as such, learned advocate prays that the petitioner may be released on bail. State opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS as also before the doctor who conducted her medico-legal examination. Having considered both the versions, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
2 Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2550 of 2026 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)