Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3300/2026 of HASINA SABNAM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 22 (Anticipatory bail) (Allowed) ( Dd ) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional Appellate Side CRM ( A )/3300/2026 In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik
08.10.2026
Serial no. 22
(Anticipatory bail)
(Allowed)
( Dd )
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdictional
Appellate Side
CRM (A)/3300/2026
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438
of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponding to Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with GR case No. 2544of 2026 arising out of Dankuni Police Station Case No. 360 of 2026 dated 07.09.2026 under Sections 109(1)/ 115(2)/ 126(2)/ 308(2)/ 318(4)/
336(3)/ 340(2)/ 351(3)/ 352/ 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before ld. ACJM, Serampore, Hooghly.
-And-
In the matter of : HASINA SABNAM
… … Petitioner
Mr. Kalyan Bandopadhya, ld. Sr. Adv.
Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay,
Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh,
Mr. Md. Danish Farooqui,
Mr. Suhotro Roy,
Ms. Sneha Sarkar, Advocates
… … For the Petitioner
Mr. Kallol Mondal, ld. PP
Mr. Sayak Chakraborti, JGA,
Mr. Aditya Tiwari,
Mr. Anamitra Banerjee,
Mr. Pritm Roy , Advocates
… …For the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner is the erstwhile Chairperson of a municipality.
2. There is not criminal antecedent so far as the petitioner is concerned as appearing from the memorandum of evidence filed in Court which be taken on record.
3. Issue of false implication exists. Claim of the petitioner is that on the change of political regime in the State of West Bengal, the petitioner was falsely implicated.
2
4. Considering the fact that petitioner is a lady and considering the fact that there is no criminal antecedent so far as the petitioner is concerned and considering the materials in the case diary, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigations till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
6. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.
7. CRM (A)/3300/2026 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) DEBABRATA DAS Digitally signed by DEBABRATA DAS Date: 2026.10.08 18:11:12 +05'30'