Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3359/2026 of ASHIM SINGHA ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
No. 37 S.D. Allowed C.R.M.( A ) 3359 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 772 of 2026 dated 31.07.2026 under Sections 318(4)/336(3)/340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026
Ct. No. 37 S.D. Allowed
C.R.M.(A) 3359 of 2026
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Domkal Police Station Case No. 772 of 2026 dated 31.07.2026 under Sections 318(4)/336(3)/340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Murshidabad at Berahmpore. And
In Re : Ashim Singha Roy ...… petitioner Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Mr. Anisur Rahaman …for the petitioner Mr. Pradip Banerjee Mr. Haripada Nayak Mr. Jnip Bose
…for the State Mr. Golam Mostafa Mr. T.S. Samanta
…for the defacto complainant
Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioner be kept on record. Memo of evidence filed on behalf of the State be taken on record. Petitioner prays anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner refers to various orders passed by the High Court. He submits that there is an issue as to whether or not the petitioner is the son of the deceased in whose favour a ration shop was standing received consideration by various authorities. He submits that wife of the deceased acknowledged the petitioner as her son although not being a biological one.
In view of the police complaint involving civil disputes in the nature as noted above, I deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. Petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation. The petitioner shall appear on every date before the Jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
SUROJIT DAS Digitally signed by SUROJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.09 12:04:45 +05'30'