Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2288/2026 of BIPLAB TALUKDAR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 8 October 2026
Court No.35. M/L. 90 Kausik (Allowed) CRM (M) 2288 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Nimta Police Station Case No. 356 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024 under
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Court No.35. M/L. 90
Kausik (Allowed)
CRM (M) 2288 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/ Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Nimta Police Station Case No. 356 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024 under section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
And In the matter of : Biplab Talukdar
……Petitioner.
Mr. Sumanta Chakraborty
Ms. Dhriti Das
Ms. Tanisha Parua
……for the Petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Bera
Ms. Sharmistha Das
….for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits he is aged 58 years and has been detained in custody for 1 year 10 months. Only 1 witness till date has been examined and he has been foisted with a criminal case for other reasons.
State has opposed the prayer for bail.
I have taken into account the medico legal examination report of the victim girl and also considered the period of detention of the present petitioner. Records reflect that for several dates other witnesses are not appearing after PW 1 was examined.
2
Having considered the overall circumstances of the case particularly the period of incarceration, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, petitioner, namely Biplab Talukdar be enlarged on bail subject to furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Judge, Special Court (POCSO Act), Barrackpore, North 24 Parganas.
If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of District of North 24 Parganas without the prior permission of the learned Special Court.
Accordingly, CRM (M) 2288 of 2026 is allowed.
Report submitted by the State in respect of the service having been effected upon the private opposite party be kept with the record.
All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)