Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3270/2026 of ERAB SK. @ YERAB SK. AND ANR Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

DL-11 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3270 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with

08.10.2026

DL-11

Court No.37

[Bench ID-265691]

(AD)

(Allowed)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M. (A) 3270 of 2026

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Burwan Police Station Case No.550 of 2025

dated 12.12.2025 under Sections 85/103/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 later Charge Sheet submitted under Sections 85/115(2)/108/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending before the Court of the Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kandi, Murshidabad, (G.R. Case No.2402 of 2025).

And

In the matter of: Erab Sk. @ Yerab Sk. & Anr.

….petitioners

Mr. Manas Kumar Das, Advocate

…for the petitioners

Mr. Subrata Mukherjee, Advocate

Mr. Sourabh Shee, Advocate

Mr. Narattam Acharyya, Advocate

… for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record.

2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.

3. Prayer is opposed on behalf of the State.

4. Police filed charge sheet.

5. Husband is in custody.

6. The petitioner no.1 is 71 years of age. Petitioner no.2 is the wife of the brother-in-law of the deceased.

7. Considering the age of the petitioner no.1 and considering the fact that the petitioner no.2 is a lady and considering the fact that the police filed charge sheet, I do not find it necessary to place any of the petitioners in custody.

8. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

9. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the

2 petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

10. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

11. C.R.M. (A) 3270 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.08 19:30:15 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead