Calcutta High Court
WPA/23817/2026 of ASMINA BIBI Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 8 October 2026
Sl. No. 417 Ct. No. 39 Srimanta IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA/23817/2026 In Re: ASMINA BIBI Mr. Badrul Karim, Mr. Sayed Hossain, Mr. Aritra Ghosh …for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for the E.C.I. Mr. Soujanya Bandyopadhyay
08.10.2026
Sl. No. 417
Ct. No. 39
Srimanta
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
WPA/23817/2026
In Re: ASMINA BIBI
Mr. Badrul Karim,
Mr. Sayed Hossain,
Mr. Aritra Ghosh
…for the petitioner.
Ms. Anamika Pandey
…for the E.C.I.
Mr. Soujanya Bandyopadhyay
...for the State.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Affidavit-of-service filed by the petitioner in Court today be kept with the record.
2. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that without giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner is prayer was rejected and his name has been excluded from electoral roll. The petitioner may be given opportunity of hearing otherwise petitioner will suffer injury which cannot be compensated in any manner.
3. Having hard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties, it appears from the record that he was not given an opportunity of hearing to place his case. Accordingly, the Tribunal is requested to consider and dispose of the SIR
2 Appeal preferred by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible upon giving a proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner preferably within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order.
4. It is needless to mention that this court has not gone into the merits of the case and the same may be decided independently and in accordance with law without being influenced by any observations made by this court.
5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of.
6. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties taking all legal formalities.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)