Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2046/2026 of GOURANGA HALDER @ GOURANGYA HALDER Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
ct 33 C.R.M.(M) No. 2046 of 2026 sl no. 25 cm In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Berhamporea P.S. Case No. 1400 of 2024 dated 18.09.2024 Sections 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And Rejected
08.10.2026
ct 33
C.R.M.(M) No. 2046 of 2026
sl no. 25
cm
In Re : In Re : An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Berhamporea P.S.
Case No. 1400 of 2024 dated 18.09.2024 Sections 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
And
Rejected
In Re : Gouranga Halder @ Gourangya Halder.
….. petitioner
Mr. Arnab Chatterjee
Mr. Avik Ghosh
…… for the petitioner
Mr. Pradip Banerjee, Ld. A.P.P.
Mr. Arijit Bhusan Bagchi
…… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard the submissions of the learned advocates representing the petitioner and the State.
2. The prayer for bail had been disallowed by the coordinate Bench of this Court on 3rd February, 2026 in CRM(M) 98 of 2026.
3. The learned advocate representing the State submitted 10 out of 23 witnesses to have been examined pursuant to the order passed by the coordinate Bench of this Court only to further witnesses after P.W.8 had been examined. The learned trial court is to take immediate steps in proceedings with the trial and expeditiously conclude the examination of the remaining witnesses to the best of its ability. The prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected considering the gravity of the offence.
2
4. The memo of evidence filed by the State be taken on record.
5. Accordingly, the application being CRM(M) 2046 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)