Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3379/2026 of SK. IMRAN Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
DL-58 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Rejected) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3379 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with PTN
08.10.2026
DL-58
Court No.37
[Bench ID-265691]
(AD)
(Rejected)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M. (A) 3379 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with PTN No. WBML010 029922026 arising out of Manikchak Police Station Case No.303 of 2026 dated 20.05.2026 under Sections 85/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now this case is pending before the Learned Sessions Judge, Malda.
And
In the matter of: Sk Imran
….petitioner
Mr. Kalidas Saha, Advocate
Mr. Khushi Mollick, Advocate
Mr. Pikesh Kumar Chauhan, Advocate
…for the petitioner
Mr. Ranjan Chakraborti, Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Singh, Advocate
… for the State
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Petitioner stands implicated in an incident of assault.
3. Petitioner assaulted his wife.
4. Injury suffered by the victim is apparently a fracture on the nose.
5. Victim identified the petitioner as the assailant.
6. Neighbours corroborate the version of the victim.
7. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner in the incident, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
9. C.R.M. (A) 3379 of 2026 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.) +05'30'