Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3358/2026 of NURSAHIDA BIBI SK AND ANR. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
41 Court No.37 S.D. Rejected CRM ( A ) 3358 of 2026 In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Memari Police Station Case No. 320 of 2026 dated 03.05.2026 under Sections 85/108/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026
Court No.37
S.D. Rejected
CRM (A) 3358 of 2026
In re: An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Memari Police Station Case No. 320 of 2026 dated 03.05.2026 under Sections 85/108/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
-And-
In the matter of: Nursahida Bibi Sk & Anr.
… … Petitioner s
Mr. Sujan Chatterjee
Mr. Rohan Bavishi
… … For the Petitioners
Mr. Gouranga Kumar Das, Ld. APP.,
Mr. Amal Kumar Dutta
Mr. Ayan Mitra
…For the State
Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that the petitioner no. 1 is the mother-in-law and the petitioner no. 2 is the husband of the victim. He submits that the victim committed suicide 18 years into the marriage. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement of the daughter of the victim recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS. In the statement, the daughter implicates both the petitioners in repeatedly assaulting the victim. The daughter also implicates both the petitioners in meting out both physical and mental torture upon the victim.
Considering such materials in the case diary and gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioners as transpiring therefrom, I am unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected. The application being C.R.M. (A) 3358 of 2026 stands dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
SUROJIT DAS Digitally signed by SUROJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.08 18:24:04 +05'30'