Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3265/2026 of ANITA BISWAS AND ORS. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
DL-8 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3265 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with
08.10.2026
DL-8
Court No.37
[Bench ID-265691]
(AD)
(Allowed)
In the High Court at Calcutta
Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
C.R.M. (A) 3265 of 2026
In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482
of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No.702 of 2026
dated
12.08.2026
under
Sections
329(3)/324(4)/117(2)/110/74/3(5)
of
Bharatiya
Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 pending for adjudication before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bongaon in GR/2514/26.
And
In the matter of: Anita Biswas & Ors.
….petitioners
Mr. Noni Gopal Sarkar, Advocate
Mr. Devranjan Das, Advocate
Mr. Sk. Mustafi Rahaman, Advocate
…for the petitioners
Mr. Kaustav Shome, Advocate
Mr. Shivan Mishra, Advocate
… for the State
Mr. Kunal Ganguly, Advocate
… for the de facto complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record.
2. Petitioners seek anticipatory bail.
3. Prayer for anticipatory bail is opposed on behalf of the State and the de facto complainant.
4. Civil disputes exist between the private parties.
5. An incident of assault took place.
6. Several persons suffered injuries. None of the injuries are classified as ‘grievous hurt’.
7. Given the nature of the incident and the involvement of the petitioners therein as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, I do not find any need for custodial interrogation of the petitioners.
8. In such circumstances, I grant anticipatory bail to the
2 petitioners.
9. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner nos.1 and 4 will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of the investigation and the petitioner nos.2,3 and 5 will report before the Investigating Officer once a month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
10. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.
11. C.R.M. (A) 3265 of 2026 is disposed of.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.08 19:31:32 +05'30'