Calcutta High Court

CRM (A)/3377/2026 of ENTAJUL SEKH @ INTAJ SEKH Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

DL-56 Court No.37 [Bench ID-265691] (AD) (Allowed) In the High Court at Calcutta Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Appellate Side C.R.M. ( A ) 3377 of 2026 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with

08.10.2026

DL-56

Court No.37

[Bench ID-265691]

(AD)

(Allowed)

In the High Court at Calcutta

Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction

Appellate Side

C.R.M. (A) 3377 of 2026

In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Mothabari Police Station Case No.85 of 2026

dated

31.01.2026

under

Sections

126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(1)/109/3(5)

of

the

Bharatiya

Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending adjudication before the Court of the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Malda (G.R.

Case No.1937 of 2026).

And

In the matter of: Entajul Sekh @ Intaj Sekh

….petitioner

Mr. Sk. Md. Wasim Akram, Advocate

…for the petitioner

Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharya, Advocate

Mr. Suman Chakraborty, Advocate

… for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Memo of evidence filed in Court be taken on record.

2. Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

3. In an incident of assault, the victim suffered cut injury.

4. The victim recorded his statement under Section 180 of the BNSS where he claims that, he was assaulted by sharp cutting weapon also.

5. Injury report, however, does not corroborate sharp cutting weapon being used for the purpose of inflicting the injury.

6. Police filed charge sheet.

7. Considering the nature of the incident and the involvement of the petitioner, I grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the

2 Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

9. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

10. C.R.M. (A) 3377 of 2026 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)

ABHIJIT DAS Digitally signed by ABHIJIT DAS Date: 2026.10.08 19:30:54 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead