Calcutta High Court
CRM(M)/2332/2026 of SANJAY BAIDAO @ BAIDYA @ ROY Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR on 8 October 2026
Court No.35. M/L.98. Rakib CRM (M) 2332 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chakdah Police Station case no. 322 of 2026 dated 06.03.2026 under
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Court No.35. M/L.98. Rakib
CRM (M) 2332 of 2026
In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chakdah Police Station case no. 322 of 2026 dated 06.03.2026 under Sections 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012.
And In the matter of : Sanjay Baidao @ Baidya @ Roy
……Petitioner. Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Ms. Deblina De
.....for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, Ld. APP Mr. Biswajit Tiwari Mr. Rajesh Kumar Shah
……for the State.
Report submitted by the State be kept with the record. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody for about seven months, charges have been framed and witness action has commenced. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary. I have taken into account the materials in the case including the statement of the victim under Section 183 of the BNSS and the medico legal examination report. Having considered the overall circumstances existing, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. As such, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.
2 Accordingly, the petitioner namely, Sanjay Baidao @ Baidya @ Roy shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyani, Nadia cum learned Judge, Special Court, POCSO Act, Kalyani, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date before the learned Trial Court and shall not leave the jurisdiction of district of Nadia without prior permission of the learned Special Court. Thus, CRM (M) No. 2332 of 2026 is allowed. The observations made above are only restricted for adjudication of the bail application and should not be considered a final opinion on the merits of the case. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)