Calcutta High Court

CRM(M)/2026/2026 of LITON SK. Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

08.10.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.33 Allowed IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (M) 2026 of 2026 Liton Sk. Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection

D/L 16

08.10.2026

Rohit, A.R.(Ct.)

ct.no.33

Allowed

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION

APPELLATE SIDE

C.R.M (M) 2026 of 2026

Liton Sk.

Vs

The State of West Bengal

In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sessions Case No.

60 of 2023 arising out of Bhagwangola Police Station Case No. 501 of

dated

22.07.2022

under

Sections

498(A)/447/323/325/326/307/506/302/34 of the IPC.

And

In the matter of : Liton Sk.

…Petitioner.

Mr. Mritunjoy Chatterjee

Mr. Arka Roy

Mr. Debarnab Adhikary

…for the Petitioner

Mr. Subhas Chandra Saha

Ms. Deblina Bhattacharjee

…for the State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Learned Advocate representing the petitioner submitted the earlier bail petition being CRM (DB) No. 417 of 2023 had been dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 3rd February, 2023. The present petitioner had been in custody for 193 days. It was further submitted on 08.07.2026 two co- accused persons were granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM (M) 1150 of 2026.

2. The learned Advocate representing the State submitted out of 17 witnesses, 15 witnesses had already been examined.

3. Considering the stage of trial and the co-accused persons to have been granted bail by this Court the present petitioner is favourably considered.

4. As such prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

5. Accordingly, Petitioner, namely, Liton Sk. shall furnish bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, one of whom must be local to the satisfaction of Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lalbagh, Murshidabad.

6. The petitioner shall be physically present on each and every date fixed before the learned Trial Court and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition the petitioner shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of the concerned Police Station once in a week until further orders.

7. In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial Court without justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this Court.

8. Accordingly, CRM (M) 2026 of 2026 is allowed.

9. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court.

10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead