Calcutta High Court
CRM (A)/3667/2026 of CHINARUL ISLAM @ TINARUL ISLAM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 267 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM ( A ) 3667 of 2026 In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Sagarpara PS case no. 569 of 2026 dated 21.07.2026 u/s 3(5)/316(2)/318(2)/318(4)/336(3)/351(2) of the BNS. -And- In
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Serial no. 267 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (A) 3667 of 2026
In re : An Application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023/under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with Sagarpara PS case no.
of dated 21.07.2026 u/s 3(5)/316(2)/318(2)/318(4)/336(3)/351(2) of the BNS.
-And-
In the matter of : Chinarul Islam @ Tinarul Islam
… Petitioner(s)
Ms. Riya Das
… for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Goutam Dey Mr. Amit Roy
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been foisted with the present criminal case as it has been claimed by the complainant that the amount was transmitted to him and the same was by way of allurement, deception and misrepresentation. State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. I have taken into account the overall circumstances of the case and I find that there are no accusations of forgery so far as the present petitioner is concerned. Having regard to the same, I am of the view that custodial detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted.
Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner [Chinarul Islam @ Tinarul Islam] be released on anticipatory bail subject to the satisfaction of the arresting officer of the case and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. As the investigation of the case is still in progress, the petitioner shall meet with the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of ten days from date and, thereafter, on all subsequent dates as would be fixed by the Investigating Officer of the case for the sake of investigation till the report in final form is submitted before the learned jurisdictional court. Accordingly, CRM (A) 3667 of 2026 is disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)