Calcutta High Court
CRM (NDPS)/2085/2026 of MD SAMSULZOHA SK @ SADDAM Vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL on 8 October 2026
no. 30 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (NDPS) 2085 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak PS Case No. 1956 of 2025 dated 25.11.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
08.10.2026 Serial no. 30 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court)
CRM (NDPS) 2085 of 2026
In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kaliachak PS Case No. 1956 of 2025 dated 25.11.2025 u/s 21(c)/27A/29 of the NDPS Act.
-And-
In the matter of : Md. Samsulzoha Sk. @ Saddam
… Petitioner(s)
Mr. Subhrajyoti Das
… for the Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sagar Saha Ms. Nayana Mukhopadhyay
… for the State-respondent(s)
Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the recovery of 4.727 kg of brown sugar was allegedly recovered from a neighbouring house of the petitioner, thereafter, he was arrested on 13.1.2026. The petitioner has no connection with the said house. There were subsequent recoveries of 273 gm of brown sugar. State opposes the prayer for bail in view of huge quantity of seizure in the present case Having considered the huge quantity of seizure in the present case and part recovery has been made from the present petitioner, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail.
Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS)
of is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)